What do you guys think of purefurs?

Posted under /swa/

Definition: A purefur is a furry who abstains from gooning, pornography, zoophilia, and degeneracy in general, a purefur is a furry who rejects all the gooner garbage that the larger furry fandom has.

ChrisCrossGriffin said:

Insert original title here

What do YOU think of purefurs, OP, do you support them or are you against them?

TitanTVMan said:

Definition: A purefur is a furry who abstains from gooning, pornography, zoophilia, and degeneracy in general, a purefur is a furry who rejects all the gooner garbage that the larger furry fandom has.

What do YOU think of purefurs, OP, do you support them or are you against them?

Its a complicated thing
I support them because they are keyed giggle chats
But at the same time i don't like them because they are furries

ChrisCrossGriffin said:

Its a complicated thing
I support them because they are keyed giggle chats
But at the same time i don't like them because they are furries

I support Purefurs, but ONLY under these additional circumstances that can and should align with their beliefs:
-No blasphemy, being blasphemous is degenerate behavior.
-No supporting the LGBTQ+ or any other form of faggotry, Purefurs must be anti-queer if they wish to clean up the furry community.
-No drawing porn, even for money. Drawing porn for money should be prohibited since it's essentally the same thing as prostitution.
-No attacking $WÅ.

Idk actually but good for them
Plus all (ok not all of it but still 99.9% of it, the tolerable ones are RARE) their porn has subjects like polyamory(), incest(), disgusting fetishes () (@Creator), pedo garbage (:merchant) and abysmal dialogue

OPShredder said:

Idk actually but good for them
Plus all (ok not all of it but still 99.9% of it, the tolerable ones are RARE) their porn has subjects like polyamory(), incest(), disgusting fetishes () (@Creator), pedo garbage (:merchant) and abysmal dialogue

Furry porn comes in two flavors:
1: Watered down zoophilia (porn of anthros)
2: Blatant zoophilia ()
Furry porn is inherently zoophilic and should be resisted against.

6gaZillionbrapZ said:

better than majority of furfags, but still sux because xhey want to be an animal which no sane person would do, and xhey're rare.

Of course they're rare, 99% of furries are in it for the fetish.

>xhey want to be an animal

Doesn't this desire to become an animal belong to a seperate group of people called "therians" or am i missing something?

TitanTVMan said:

Of course they're rare, 99% of furries are in it for the fetish.

>xhey want to be an animal

Doesn't this desire to become an animal belong to a seperate group of people called "therians" or am i missing something?

Yes

TitanTVMan said:

Of course they're rare, 99% of furries are in it for the fetish.

>xhey want to be an animal

Doesn't this desire to become an animal belong to a seperate group of people called "therians" or am i missing something?

Both want to be animals but in different ways, therians act like retards moving on 4 parts and shit like that, furfags want to be ones through expensive suits and fantasizing about being an animal and fucking other animal through furfag porn, basically poop vs pee

A question for everyone ITT:
What if someone is not only a purefur but also doesn't partake in fursuiting, doesn't have a fursona or self inserts as a furry in any sort of way? How do we deal with that?

TitanTVMan said:

A question for everyone ITT:
What if someone is not only a purefur but also doesn't partake in fursuiting, doesn't have a fursona or self inserts as a furry in any sort of way? How do we deal with that?

You mean like chuck jones? looney tunes is good shit

FuckeedAndSuckeed said:

You mean like chuck jones? looney tunes is good shit

Yes, like that, but is Chuck Jones even a furry or just a cartoonist? He does non-anthro characters like Yosemite Sam and Elmer Fudd,

1 2