Shitlita was banned for having pedophilic origins and being an overall pedo dogwhistle (color pallette being map flag,named after a book where a 12 year old gets raped shitlet is traced after a drawing trend from blue archive,a game known for having pedos in its fandumb and fanservicing its underage characters The conclusion? Smuglet is inherently pedophilic and should be treat no different thatn soylita.
Is he too ESL to properly form a sentence? I think he's also contradicting himself like he commented that he knew it's a loli but couldn't resist the pregnancy, yet here he says that he didn't know
>0:21 Killing a bunch of people in GTA is NOT the same as watching porn of little cartoon girls being raped, retarded nigger. Furthermore, there are major neurological distinctions between watching pornography and playing violent games. Violent games do not produce the same kind of long-term effects on the brain as porn, and the brain is much more plastic when it comes to the effects of video games. The brain is wired to respond to sex in a completely different way than violence, and the effects of watching porn can be much more long-lasting and damaging.
I have no idea what the fuck happened to der ‘ru And I know it’s Quote but it’s just some vague answer I really need to know I see troons ripping apart soy culture
Contrary to popular belief, mustard is mostly responsible for the current state of the ‘ru, due to quotes inactiveness
I find it weird how creator turned degenerate after his eye got fucked up, prior to having a lazy eye he was normal, and after he got into all this degenerate shit, it makes me think that he acquired his lazy eye from getting clobbered in the head, which turned him into an mpreg gooner as a side effect
I find it weird how creator turned degenerate after his eye got fucked up, prior to having a lazy eye he was normal, and after he got into all this degenerate shit, it makes me think that he acquired his lazy eye from getting clobbered in the head, which turned him into an mpreg gooner as a side effect
>Hello this is taxi service? <Yes sir we are, do you need a ride? >Do you have cars? <What kind of question is that? of course we do! >Good for you, We don't have any. <
>Hello this is taxi service? <Yes sir we are, do you need a ride? >Do you have cars? <What kind of question is that? of course we do! >Good for you, We don't have any. <
>Hello this is taxi service? <Yes sir we are, do you need a ride? >Do you have cars? <What kind of question is that? of course we do! >Good for you, We don't have any. <
>Hello this is taxi service? <Yes sir we are, do you need a ride? >Do you have cars? <What kind of question is that? of course we do! >Good for you, We don't have any. <