Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

mr_brapman said:

They only did that for a week? The gif captions that have watermarks must be rarer than I thought

There's an earrape video of Ed, Edd, and Eddy's Eddy going inside a mailbox, and it's one of the only existing proof that it also applied to videos as well. Super rare finds, and I believe one gif with that watermark was posted here a while ago. It might've been a legal concern now that I'm thinking about how long it lasted.

  • 1
  • Reply | Gator
  • [hidden]

    TeeThingus_Bonemantics said:

    I hate that an apt word such as "beastiality" is a misspelling. It's "bestiality." Why?! Screw whatever reason some Harvard scumbag has for why it needs to be that way, it's in direct reference to the bankrupt actions towards the "beasts," it SHOULD be my spellng!

    Wait, "BEASTiality" is wrong? How?

  • 1
  • Reply | Gator
  • [hidden]

    TeeThingus_Bonemantics said:

    There was a week or so during 2017 or 2018 where they baked a low-opacity smiley face onto uploaded gifs and videos, but people hated it, and it was quickly removed.

    They only did that for a week? The gif captions that have watermarks must be rarer than I thought

  • 1
  • Reply | Gator
  • [hidden]

    xXD4NKM3M3L0V3R2005Xx said:

    OG iFunny gif captions didn't have watermarks, so IDK if that would be a good idea. Maybe make it an option?

    There was a week or so during 2017 or 2018 where they baked a low-opacity smiley face onto uploaded gifs and videos, but people hated it, and it was quickly removed.

  • 1
  • Reply | Gator
  • [hidden]

    6gazillionbraps said:

    Honestly i think 💭 that SWA gif caption studio is a good idea (though should there be watermarks so more people could find the site on which the meme was made on or no?)

    OG iFunny gif captions didn't have watermarks, so IDK if that would be a good idea. Maybe make it an option?

  • 0
  • Reply | Gator